Healthy isn?t something you are or aren?t. It?s a hundred little things: eating a banana, walking in the park, putting a bandage on a boo-boo, playing tag, reading up on ways to keep you and your family well and safe. It?s a balance between living well and taking care, and you can start right where you are.
A blog by Christina Elston
Healthy isn't something you are or aren't. It's a hundred little things: eating a banana, walking in the park, putting a bandage on a boo-boo, playing tag, reading up on ways to keep you and your family well and safe. It's a balance between living well and taking care, and you can start right where you are.


Archive for January, 2012

Kids Who Are Stressed More Likely To Gain Weight

Tuesday, January 31st, 2012

Nine-year-olds stressed out by chronic violence, poor housing, poverty and family turmoil are more likely to become obese by age 13 than those who aren’t – probably because these stresses erode self-control.

Cornell University researchers evaluated exposure of 244 children to nine different ongoing stressors, measured their height and weight at age 9, and measured their ability to delay gratification by waiting for a large plate of candy rather than having a smaller plate right away. Four years later, they evaluated the children’s height and weight again.

The children who were exposed to chronic stress were heavier than they otherwise would have been, the researchers concluded. Adults who can “self-regulate” are better able to follow healthy habits, and the study’s authors believe this is true of children as well. And there is evidence that parts of the brain that are sensitive to stress are also involved in helping us regulate our behavior and control impulses.

Previous studies have also linked stress to weight gain in children, and researchers involved with this study suggest that a multi-pronged approach – targeting all areas of stress rather than just one – is the best way to help these kids.

The study was published online Jan. 30 in the journal Pediatrics.

Kids Need Booster Seats In Carpools, Too

Monday, January 30th, 2012

Sure, you buckle your 7-year-old into her booster seat whenever she rides in your car. But what happens when she carpools to soccer practice with her friends?

It turns out that while most parents of kids ages 4-8 report using a booster seat when their child rides in the family car, more than 30 percent responding to a new survey said they let their kids skip the booster seat when riding with another driver. And 45 percent said they don’t make their own kids use a booster seat when driving with other children who do not have one.

The research, from the University of Michigan’s C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, appears online today in Pediatrics.

Most states require children to use a booster seat, and the national recommendation is for use of booster seats until a child is 57 inches tall, the average height of an 11-year-old.

Around 70 percent of parents carpool kids at least some of the time. Yes, it can be a hassle to arrange with other parents for kids to bring their own booster. And yes, it can be tough to fit them all in the car, but it’s worth it. Prior research has shown that children ages 4-8 are 45 percent less likely to be injured in a crash with a booster than if they were using seatbelts alone. Leaving the booster at home means leaving kids at risk.

Get information on keeping kids of all ages safe in the car from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. http://www.nhtsa.gov/Safety/CPS

Costs From Childhood Asthma Soaring

Friday, January 27th, 2012

In Long Beach and Riverside, traffic-related pollution is adding $18 million per year to the cost of childhood asthma, almost half of which is due to new asthma cases caused by pollution. That’s the finding from a study released Jan. 25 in the online European Respiratory Journal. The study is the first cost estimate to include cases attributable to air pollution.

Researchers from University of Massachusetts Amherst with colleagues from Switzerland and USC looked at costs such as parents’ missed time from work, extra doctor visits, travel time and prescriptions. Their findings include:

• A single episode of bronchitic symptoms (cough, congestion or bronchitis for three months in a row) in a child with asthma cost an average $972 in Riverside and $915 in Long Beach

• Total annual cost for a typical asthma case was $3,819 in Long Beach and $4,063 in Riverside

• The estimated yearly cost for families coping with asthma in Long Beach and Riverside represents 7 percent of median household income in those communities, a level too high to be sustainable for most.

The largest share of the cost of asthma was the indirect costs to parents missing work because their children are out of school, the authors noted. They say traditional assessment methods have underestimated the financial burden of asthma on families, and the cost of the disease due to air pollution. And because Riverside and Long Beach account for 7 percent of California’s total population, they estimate that air pollution’s contribution to the cost of asthma state-wide is “truly substantial.”

Cycle For Survival Comes To L.A. Feb. 4

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

In 2007, rare-cancer patient Jennifer Goodman Linn held a small cycling event with a few friends at an Equinox club in New York City, hoping to raise $10,000 for research into rare cancers at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSK). Jen had been diagnosed with sarcoma, a soft tissue cancer, a few years earlier, and she and her husband, Dave, were surprised to learn that research into rare cancers is often underfunded, leaving patients with limited treatment options – even though they account for more than half of all cancer diagnoses and are well-recognized by name. In fact, leukemia, lymphoma, brain, pancreatic, ovarian and all pediatric cancers are considered rare forms of the disease.

What started out as a small event among friends quickly grew into a national movement called Cycle for Survival. In just five years, Cycle for Survival has raised more than $12 million to fund more than 25 clinical trials and research studies led by MSK. What sets Cycle apart is that within six months of the events, every dollar raised is allocated to research projects led by MSK. This means patients quickly see the benefits of donations in the form of new clinical trials and investigational treatment options.

Sadly, Jen passed away in July 2011, but thousands of Cycle for Survival participants are carrying on Jen’s vision in her honor. This year, Cycle for Survival will be held at Equinox clubs (the event’s founding sponsor) in New York City, Long Island, Washington D.C., Chicago and San Francisco – and on Feb. 4 in Los Angeles.

Keith Ayers, a 31-year-old immigration lawyer and writer from Brentwood, will be riding in the L.A. event and told us a bit about his connection to Cycle for Survival.

 

What is your personal experience with rare cancer and your connection with the cause?

I was diagnosed with Ewing’s Sarcoma, a rare bone cancer, when I was 22. My diagnosis came two weeks before finals during my first year of law school in 2002. In the middle of treatment my friend from high school, Alan, who was also 22, was also diagnosed with a rare sarcoma and also underwent his treatment at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC).

I have been cancer free for over nine years now. Unfortunately, Alan’s cancer came back and he passed away in 2004. It was a tough couple of years with treatment and its aftermath, with Alan’s passing and the constant fear of the cancer coming back. But what got me through it was focusing on others. I realized that I had to pay it forward to patients and families who were in the same position Alan and I were in. My sister befriended the founder of Cycle For Survival, and once we heard about their cause and how it targeted rare cancers specifically, we were all in.

 

What is your involvement this year? Describe your team and what you hope to raise.

We have a bike in NYC and L.A. this year and I will be riding with friends and family from both coasts. Our team goal is to raise $10,000 this year and we’re very close to reaching it. I invite everyone that I know to come out and ride the day of cycle.

 

Why do you think it is important for people in L.A. to get involved with Cycle For Survival?

Cancer touches every family and I think it empowers people when you let them get involved in events and fundraisers that make such a difference like Cycle. MSKCC is one of the top cancer hospitals in the world, especially when it comes to rare cancers. When I was in treatment, there were kids from all over the country and world being flown in to get treatment there. When MSKCC makes a breakthrough and comes up with more effective ways to treat cancer, that knowledge spreads to hospitals throughout the country. The drugs and treatments have already improved since I ended my treatment in 2003. It’s great way to get involved and make a difference.

 

What makes the Feb. 4 ride fun?

The energy and passion in the room is exhilarating. It’s a great place to meet people, get a good workout, meet with friends and family, share war stories, cope and inspire. There is something for everyone and it’s a great atmosphere.

 

What does the event offer for families?

While cyclists participating in the event must be 18 to ride, there will be kids’ activities on-site (and kids can cheer on their parents or teenage siblings too!). Plus, many parents/families ride to raise funds for kids with cancer. In fact, pediatric cancers are all rare cancers.

 

Cycle for Survival teams register to ride for a four-hour shift, with a maximum of eight riders per bike. Teams may register multiple bikes. The event also features complimentary yoga classes, massage therapy and children’s activities.

Cycle for Survival, 8 a.m.-noon Feb. 4, Equinox Westwood, 10960 Wilshire Blvd., L.A.; www.cycleforsurvival.org.

 

Big Changes in the School Cafeteria

Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

Editor’s Note: Here’s a guest post from Deirdre Wilson, a colleague of mine and Senior Editor at Dominion Parenting Media.

School cafeteria food is getting a major facelift. For the first time in 15 years, the USDA has raised the standards for school meals eaten by nearly 32 million American kids each week day. It’s just one part of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act championed by First Lady Michelle Obama in her Let’s Move campaign to combat childhood obesity.

“As parents, we try to prepare decent meals, limit how much junk food our kids eat, and ensure they have a reasonably balanced diet,” the First Lady says in a statement about the new guidelines. “And when we’re putting in all that effort the last thing we want is for our hard work to be undone each day in the school cafeteria. When we send our kids to school, we expect that they won’t be eating the kind of fatty, salty, sugary foods that we try to keep them from eating at home. We want the food they get at school to be the same kind of food we would serve at our own kitchen tables.”

The new school meal regulations call for:

 

• Fruits and vegetables in school meals every week day;

• A significant increase in whole grain foods;

• Only fat-free or low-fat milk;

• Portion sizes limited to a total calorie count appropriate for the age of the kids served; and

• More focus on reducing saturated and trans fats and sodium.

 

The rules are based on recommendations from a panel of experts convened by the Institute of Medicine; they were also modified to take into account more than 130,000 public comments submitted when the regulations were first proposed. They won’t be easily implemented, however; the new standards are expected to cost $3.2 billion over the next five years, the USDA says, and are just one of five major parts of the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act. Among the improvements still to come are:

 

• New restrictions on what can and can’t be sold in school vending machines;

• Increased federal funding for school meals (an additional 6 cents a meal) based on how much a school improves its meal program; and

• Training and support to help schools comply with the new rules.

 

The rules will affect the National School Lunch and School Breakfast programs, the Summer Food Service Program, and supplemental food assistance programs, including the one for Women, Infants and Children (WIC).

– Deirdre Wilson

Teens Need Iron For Healthy Brain Wiring As Adults

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

Building a healthy adult brain literally begins with enough iron intake in your teens. That’s the finding from a new study by UCLA researchers. “We found that healthy brain wiring in adults depended on having good iron levels in your teenage years,” lead author Paul Thompson, a neurology professor at UCLA, said in releasing the study Jan. 11.

Thompson and colleagues monitored iron availability to the brains of 615 healthy subjects at ages 12, 14 and 16, then mapped myelin – the fatty fibers responsible for transmitting impulses between nerves – in the same subjects at age 23.

None of the subjects in the study were technically iron deficient. But adolescents with evidence of poor iron in their diets showed weaker brain connections in young adulthood, the study found. Thompson notes that the teenage brain is still actively maturing, and requires iron so that it can produce adequate myelin reserves to protect against Alzheimer’s disease later in life.

The government recommends that 9- to 13-year-olds get 8 mg of iron per day, and that boys ages in their later teens take in 11 mg, while girls take in 15 mg.

Good dietary iron sources include

• Dried beans – 2-4 mg per serving

• Iron-fortified cereal – 1-21 mg per serving

• Dried fruit – 1-1.5 mg per serving

• Lean red meat – 2-3 mg per serving

• Poultry – 1-2 mg per serving

• Salmon – .7 mg per serving

• Tuna – 1.3 mg per serving

• Shrimp – 2.5 mg per serving

The study appears online in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

 

A Cute and Comfy Bear For Little Aches Or Big Pains

Friday, January 20th, 2012

Cold and flu season is a great time to meet this little bear, the Bed Buddy Warming Bear from Carex. For your little one’s earache, or a grown-up’s aching back or menstrual cramps, pop this little guy in the microwave for a few seconds and his warm tummy and paws are ready to soothe.

 
For fever or to cool bumps and bruises (or even sports injuries), let him hibernate in the freezer. He’s so cute and cuddly, he’ll make it all better in more ways than one.

 
Available at carex.com for $19.99.

Junk Food In Middle Schools Not Key To Kids’ Obesity

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012

Pressure has been on schools in recent years to do their part in battling the childhood obesity epidemic – particularly by offering healthier school lunches and curbing sale of junk food. But a study out this week suggests the chips, candy and sodas kids buy in middle school doesn’t impact their weight at all.

In a largescale effort, researchers crunched data on 19,450 children participating in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, which followed a nationally representative sample of kids from kindergarten through eighth grade between 1998 and 2007. And their results surprised even the study’s authors.

When the students in the study were in fifth grade, just under 60 percent went to schools that sold junk food. By the time they got to eighth grade, over 86 percent attended campuses where junk food was sold. Researchers expected that this would translate to more overweight and obese students – but it didn’t. In fact, the percentage of students who were overweight or obese decreased slightly.

The authors were so surprised by the result that they delayed publishing the research, which appeared in the January issue of Sociology of Education, for two years while they reviewed the data. They released their report because:

1. It all added up. Researchers used several types of statistical models and measures to make sure their results were sound. “Even after looking at the data hundreds of different ways, we never found a significant relationship between competitive food sales and increases in children’s weight between fifth and eighth grade,” says lead author Jennifer Van Hook, who directs the Population Research Institute at Pennsylvania State University.

2. Past research was focused on food, not weight. In reviewing previous studies on the topic, Van Hook and her team looked at a 2004 study that found students who had access to a snack bar consumed fewer healthy foods and more sweetened drinks, and a 2005 study showing high school students were less likely to buy food from vending machines when there were fewer working vending machines on campus. But there were no studies directly linking increased sale of junk food at schools to increased weight in students. “Thus, our expectation that competitive food sales should increase children’s weight was not actually supported by prior research,” she says.

3. School isn’t that big a part of kids’ overall dietary picture. “Children eat only a small portion of their food at school, including junk food,” says Van Hook. Previous research found that just 6 percent of the soda consumed by children came from school vending machines, for example. Research also suggests that during their structured school day, kids have less time for snacking then they would at home. And finally, studies indicate that children’s eating habits and food preferences are largely established in early childhood, before they ever start school.

Based on her team’s findings, Van Hook says it will likely take the coordinated efforts of educators, health care providers, parents, business and government to truly reduce childhood obesity. “Schools can’t do it alone,” she insists. “Schools do not seem to be good at drastically changing a student’s weight, and the elimination of junk food sales in schools is unlikely to upend the child obesity epidemic.”

Why You Should Test Your Home For Radon

Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

There’s not really a radon “season.” This colorless, odorless gas is around all year around – maybe even in your home. It’s a natural, radioactive gas that comes from the breakdown of uranium in soil, rock and water, then seeps into homes through cracks in the foundation, piping, etc.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has declared January National Radon Action Month, so this is a good time to share some facts.

1. Radon is the leading cause of lung cancer among non-smokers. Around 21,000 people in the U.S. die from radon-related lung cancer every year.

2. Radon can be found in every state. As many as one in every 15 U.S. homes has elevated radon levels, and the rate is higher in some locations than in others. You can find a map of radon zones here.  Most of Southern California is in a “moderate” zone, but experts stress that every part of the country has homes with radon.

3. You can get a radon test kit at your local hardware store. Most cost $12-$15. In many cases, you can get kits for even less through your state radon program. Click here to find your state contact.

4. Lowering radon levels in your home doesn’t have to be expensive. Several methods of reducing levels exist, from drawing radon from below your home and venting it to the outside air, to sealing cracks in your home’s foundation to keep radon from penetrating into the house. The price tags on these projects will vary, but are usually in line with other home-maintenance costs.

Get more information about radon, testing your home, and lowering levels if you do find you have a radon problem through the EPA at www.epa.gov/radon.

What We All Need To Know About EpiPens

Friday, January 13th, 2012

The death of a 7-year-old girl at her Virginia elementary school earlier this year grabbed national headlines and left school officials and others scrambling to explain the lack of a simple little device that could have saved her life.

The girl was allergic to peanuts and died of a severe reaction. The device is an epinephrine auto-injector, more commonly known by its brand name, EpiPen. And with the food allergy rate among American children at around 4 percent (and climbing by many accounts), it isn’t just parents of allergic children who need to know a thing or two about these potentially life-saving gizmos.

 

Who Needs One?

Epinephrine auto-injectors are designed to allow a person without medical training to easily inject someone having a serious allergic reaction with the drug epinephrine, which should halt the reaction and could save the person’s life. You just remove the safety cap, hold the device against the thigh and push the plunger to release the spring-loaded hypodermic.

Nut allergies account for 85 percent of fatal allergic reactions in the United States, so people with nut allergies make up the majority of the EpiPen-holding population. “Anyone who has a nut allergy needs an Epi Pen,” says Roger Friedman, M.D., an allergist with Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Ohio. But people with other types of serious allergies also have EpiPen prescriptions.

Click here for tips on storing and using an EpiPen …